SAP S/4HANA Transformation

Press Comments SAP S/4HANA

SAP S/4HANA Migration vs Oracle Solutions

Compared to the transfer from SAP R/3 to SAP S/4HANA, the Oracle solutions deliver a more effective cost-to-performance ratio and significantly reduced deployment times.

Existing SAP R/3 installations need to be transformed to SAP S/4 HANA by 2025. Full Speed Systems offers its customers alternative solutions with equivalent functionality at a fraction of the initial and operating costs. With Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne or Oracle Netsuite we guarantee our customers a worry-free replacement of existing SAP installations. We are happy to advise you without obligation in the evaluation of your most suitable ERP solution.

SAP Alternatives

Attractive alternatives to the SAP S / 4 HANA transformation

Full Speed EnterpriseOne Full Speed NetSuiteOne

SCENARIO: Complete Replacement

Effect: Simplification / Cost Reduction / Ease of Use – Same Functionality

The business is getting smaller, is being sold or is being carved-out – or – the current ERP solution is to complex and to heavy for the business. The required ERP functionality is being assessed and a lean, easy to use solution is the right choice. There is a need to save money and an urgency for a lean and cost effective ERP solution.


Expenses for data migration in the areas of costs and personnel are , in the scenario Complete Replacement, equivalent for all three systems.

Data migration for this scenario

Your business is based on one or more productive SAP instances up to release ECC 6.xx. These systems are heavily customized and adopted to your business needs and you are running Non SAP specialized appli-cations like e.g.: Non SAP CRM, non SAP PLM, Variant configurator, High Rack storage system, budgeting, etc. …


SCENARIO: New Business or Enhancement

Effect: Growth is mastered in a flexible, quick, easy and cost effective way

Business is growing and new companies are joining the enterprise. The core system at HQ is SAP and the new companies must be integrated in an easy and seamless way. It is easier to implement Oracle JD Edwards or Oracle NetSuite for complex or smaller satellites, than to  change the SAP company/mandates structure.


Data migration for this scenario

Your business is based on one or more productive SAP instances up to release ECC 6.xx. These systems are heavily customized and adopted to your business. A new company is joining the enterprise with a SAP ERP or a Non SAP ERP system.


SCENARIO: Simplification

Effect: Simplification / Cost Reduction / Ease of Use

Some of the group companies require other or less functionality than the HQ (headquarters). The legacy systems of HQ are to heavy and complex to be rolled out to smaller companies. Specifically the handling of Master Data and the to be built interfaces into the HQ systems would add risk, complexity and high costs to the project.


SCENARIO: ERP Strategy per Division

Effect: Individualization / Flexibility / Ease of Use

Every division has its own ERP System, depending on its needs and requirements. The group of companies HQ runs a central consolidation and/or finance ERP to which the divisions have to report into. The divisions run their own ‘local’ finance system but report and liaise with the group finance.


SCENARIO: Master Data

Effect: Consistent and integrated Master Data

Clear and transparent concept of Master Data.


Give us a call! We would like to introduce you personally to the most modern ERP solution in the world.